Forex Calls Recap for 5/7/12

We had a gap to open the week that jumped us beyond most of our key levels, and the session was spent heading back in the other direction (EURUSD still hasn't quite filled). See EURUSD section below for recap.
Here's the US Dollar Index intraday with our market direction lines:

New calls and Chat tonight.
EURUSD:
Under our order staggering rules, at least a piece of the trade triggered at A, and part of that might have stopped at B depending on how you place your stops (has to go under by the spread plus stagger, this didn't even go three under). The rest triggered long at C, eventually hit the S1 first target at D, and we moved stop under S1, so at E, and holding:


Trouble on the AAPL Horizon?

Let's get a few things out of the way up front. We love to trade Apple's stock at Tradesight. We trade it just about daily. We go long. We go short. I love the stock as a trading device. I've made more than 600 points on the stock over the last few years, which, by definition, means that I have a better "cost basis" than anyone that just buys and holds Apple. When you trade it both ways, you can do extraordinary things.
I also hate AAPL products. I want to be clear about that. Can't stand iTunes (too limiting). Hate the computers. Hate the phones (never owned one). Had an iPad when the first one came out because I wanted to see if I thought it would be a form factor that I would use. Turns out, it was. Got rid of it as soon as a good Android tablet came out. Currently using a Motorola Xyboard on Verizon 4G contract. Love it. Great device, everything a tablet should be.
Don't take my negativity above to mean that we have a "negative outlook" on AAPL stock in general. Like I said, as a trading stock, it is one of the best. Very technical, very predictable with our tools. Now, it isn't the only trading stock that works well for us. GOOG, AMZN, NFLX and others have been and/or still are great traders. I just wanted to be very clear before I continued. I love AAPL's stock. I don't love Apple's products. The two are totally separate things to me. Frankly, I think AAPL is a better marketing company than they are a tech company. They've stolen and settled out more pieces of tech than they have designed (right down to the original iPod touch controller, which came from Creative Labs, who got a hefty check after the fact).
Apple has a decent vision. They know where technology currently is and what it can realistically fabricate in large quantity. The beauty of Apple as a company is not that they "innovate." They know what is capable of being produced, and they do whatever they have to to get there first, and then they market it up into a package that makes people feel like they are a good and cheerful person if they own one of the products.
Let's take Siri, for example, the new feature where you can say just about anything to the phone, and it will come back with an answer that is about 90% relevant. Android folks have had this for years. It's called Voice Search, which isn't a very inviting name, but it does most of what an iPhone does, and it did it before the most recent iPhone and iOS did it. But when Apple does it, they give it a name, and they make cute commercials of people having positive moments throughout their day with their phone. Heck, if that isn't enough, let's get that cute new girl from New Girl (Zooey Deschanel) to make commercials of her all happy walking around her house using Siri.
See the point? The tech isn't new. AAPL didn't have it first. I still don't think they even have it better. But the MARKET it better, for sure. And marketing goes a long way.
Anyway, the point of all of this is not that I'm up or down on AAPL's stock. I've been very bullish on the stock in the past. I approach stocks completely neutrally to whatever the company does. The two are not related, typically. So when I come here to tell you that AAPL's stock could be in some trouble, I don't do it because I don't like their products. I do it because there are bad signs in the charts.
Before we dig into said charts, let's consider one other key point about AAPL. The stock has run from $400 to $650 since January 1. That's 62%. Most of the best (and recently upgraded) analyst forecasts for late 2013 put is in the $700-800 range. From 600 to 700 is only a 16% increase. That's not really worth holding onto for high-growth funds that already caught a big move of 62% in five months. Even if they still like the company's future prospects, the reality is that owning it up here isn't as necessary as it was back at $400. It might be AGAIN, if it gets back to $400.
So, let's move to the charts.
Here's the AAPL daily chart over the last year. There is a very clear channel that it was moving along, and then it exploded out of that channel to the upside this year and went crazy:

It even left a key big gap as low as $425 on the chart, which you can see here, and which an AAPL fanboy will say will never fill:

That doesn't even count the one around $560 after earnings two weeks ago, which is already about to fill.
The thing that you have to focus on is that the funds can't just snap their fingers and be out of their AAPL positions in a day. They have to do it over time. And if you understand that the upside risk/reward is no longer very solid, you might assume that they would want to get out while all of the hype of recent earnings, the NEW iPad, and other factors, have the stock in the stratosphere.
So what would that look like? Well, it would look like a lot of volume trading with no real progress being made at some point. Do we see that at all recently?
Here's the last six months:

Ooooops. Anyone that bought the stock two months ago is even. We have a massive head formation on heavy volume despite the earnings, which they allowed to cause a 60 point gap up in the stock...and then proceeded to dump it hard for 8 days so far.
This doesn't even take into account the forward-looking concerns about the company after the unfortunate and untimely death of Steve Jobs. When the analysts look down the road at AAPL, they see about three years of "Jobs" still at work. After that, it's on someone else's shoulders.
Bubbles are bubbles. They happen in all markets. They don't affect traders that are good traders who watch market direction and the futures carefully. They do affect investors. When a stock goes parabolic like AAPL and then fails to make progress over an extended period on the heaviest volume it has seen in a long time, gravity tends to take hold.
Just remember that the NASDAQ broke out of a channel in the late 1990s and looked like this:

Right before it looked like this:

And yeah, there was a gap to fill back there that no one thought ever would.


Trading Experience

Tradesight offers insights, trade calls, and market analysis in real-time from our 24-hour Trading Lab. Our analysts have more than six decades of combined trading experience in Stocks, Futures, Forex, and Options. Learn multiple perspectives on the market from traders who have made a living out of trading.
History & Bios


Stock Picks Recap for 5/4/12

With each stock's recap, we will include a (with market support) or (without market support) tag, designating whether the trade triggered with or without market directional support at the time. Anything in the first five minutes will be considered WITHOUT market support because market direction cannot be determined that early. ETF calls do not require market support, and are thus either winners or losers.
From the report, with the gap down in the market, most of the shorts (QLIK, MASI, CELG, and PTEN) gapped under their trigger, so no plays.
LAMR triggered short (with market support) and worked:

In the Messenger, Rich's VMW triggered short (with market support) and worked:

His PCLN triggered short (with market support) and worked:

AMZN triggered short (with market support) and worked:

Rich's AAPL triggered short (with market support) and worked:

His ALXN triggered short (with market support) and didn't work:

COST triggered short (with market support) and worked:

In total, that's 7 trades triggering with market support, 6 of them worked, 1 did not.


Tradesight April 2012 Forex Results

Before we get to April’s numbers, here is a short reminder of the results from March. The full report from March can be found here and you can get the last several months in a row vertically by clicking here and scrolling down.
Tradesight Pip Results for March 2012

Number of trades: 30
Number of losers: 13
Winning percentage: 56.7%
Worst losing streak: 3 in a row (start of the month)
Net pips: +70
Reminder: Here are the rules.
1) Calls made in the calendar month count. In other words, a call made on August 31 that triggered the morning of September 1 is not part of September. Calls made on Thursday, September 30 that triggered between then and the morning of October 1 ARE part of September.
2) Trades that triggered before 8 pm EST / 5 pm PST (i.e. pre Asia) and NEVER gave you a chance to re-enter are NOT counted. Everything else is counted equally.
3) All trades are broken into two pieces, with the assumption that one half is sold at the first target and one half is sold at the final exit. These are then averaged. So if we made 40 pips on one half and 60 on the second, that’s a 50-pip winner. If we made 40 pips on one half, never adjusted our stop, and the second half stopped for the 25 pip loser, then that’s a 7 pip winner (15 divided by 2 is 7.5, and I rounded down).
4) Pure losers (trades that just stop out) are considered 25 pip losers. In some cases, this can be a few more or a few less, but it should average right in there, so instead of making it complicated, I count them as 25 pips.
5) Trade re-entries are valid if a trade stops except between 3 am EST and 9 am EST (when I’m sleeping). So in other words, even if you are awake in those hours and you could have re-entered, I’m only counting things that I would have done. This is important because otherwise the implication is that you need to be awake 24/6. Triggers that occur right on the Big Three news announcements each month don’t count as you shouldn’t have orders in that close at that time.
You can go through the reports and compare the breakdown that I give as each trade is reviewed.
Tradesight Pip Results for April 2012
Number of trades: 30
Number of losers: 16
Winning percentage: 46.7%
Worst losing streak: 6 in a row (around the 8th)
Net pips: +125
I feel lucky to have squeaked out a winning month here as ranges continue to drop and we're seeing no movement anywhere. As I pointed out in the Sunday Forex recap, the US Dollar Index has now been stuck in a small total range for about five months, and was even around the same level if you reached back seven months. This is the type of environment where we would usually have our one or two losing months of the year, but thanks mostly to a decent third week of the month, we came out ahead. But this sure isn't how we like to see it.
In last month's report, I commented that the EURUSD 6-month average daily range had dropped from 144 to 131 pips in a month, a 13-pip drop, which is quite a bit. Well, 30 days later, the EURUSD ADR is now down to 125 pips, down another 16, and down a whopping 29 pips of AVERAGE daily range in 2 months. Can't remember the last time that I saw that.
As I discussed a couple of weeks ago in a piece that I wrote here about average daily ranges, we have seen environments like this in the past. It isn't the end of the forex world. It just needs some global events to shake things up and get things moving. In the meantime, we'll stick with our strict system and wait it out for the better gains later.


Forex Calls Recap for 5/4/12

Loser and a winner to close out the week on the EURUSD. See that section below.
As usual on the Sunday report, we will take a look at the action from Thursday night/Friday, then look at the daily charts heading into the new week with the Seeker and Comber counts separately for each pair (nothing new to see and the GBPUSD Comber count didn't get any further this week than last), and then look at the US Dollar Index.
I will also be posting the April net pip results from our calls this weekend. Check the Blog or Messenger.
We are probably less than two weeks away from our new Twitter integration, which we are very excited about, and then two months away from being able to listen to the Trading Lab from the road on your phone or tablet.
Here's the US Dollar Index intraday with our market directional lines:

New calls and Chat Sunday afternoon.
EURUSD:
Triggered short at A (half size ahead of NFP) and stopped at B. Triggered short again at C (normal size with NPF behind) and hit first target at D and closed final piece at E for end of week and 55 pips:

The rest of the pairs and the market analysis piece are available for subscribers only.


Forex Calls Recap for 5/4/12

Loser and a winner to close out the week on the EURUSD. See that section below.
As usual on the Sunday report, we will take a look at the action from Thursday night/Friday, then look at the daily charts heading into the new week with the Seeker and Comber counts separately for each pair (nothing new to see and the GBPUSD Comber count didn't get any further this week than last), and then look at the US Dollar Index.
I will also be posting the April net pip results from our calls this weekend. Check the Blog or Messenger.
We are probably less than two weeks away from our new Twitter integration, which we are very excited about, and then two months away from being able to listen to the Trading Lab from the road on your phone or tablet.
Here's the US Dollar Index intraday with our market directional lines:

New calls and Chat Sunday afternoon.
EURUSD:
Triggered short at A (half size ahead of NFP) and stopped at B. Triggered short again at C (normal size with NPF behind) and hit first target at D and closed final piece at E for end of week and 55 pips:

The rest of the pairs and the market analysis piece are available for subscribers only.


Stock Picks Recap for 5/3/12

With each stock's recap, we will include a (with market support) or (without market support) tag, designating whether the trade triggered with or without market directional support at the time. Anything in the first five minutes will be considered WITHOUT market support because market direction cannot be determined that early. ETF calls do not require market support, and are thus either winners or losers.
Huge day for our picks with everything working very cleanly since market direction pretty much stuck in one direction most of the session. Should have made a bundle.
From the report, CREE triggered long (with market support) and worked:

SQNM gapped over, no play.
BMRN triggered long (without market support) and worked:

RIMM triggered short (with market support) and worked:

DLLR triggered short (with market support) and worked:

CAVM triggered short (with market support) and worked:

SOHU triggered short (with market support) and worked:

In the Messenger, Rich's OIH triggered short (ETF, no market support needed) and worked:

His RIG triggered short (with market support) and worked great:

His COST triggered short (with market support) and worked:

SINA triggered short (with market support) and worked:

Rich's GOOG triggered long (with market support) and worked enough for a partial:

His GS triggered short (with market support) and worked great:

His PCLN triggered short (with market support) and didn't work:

In total, that's 12 trades triggering with market support, 11 of them worked, 1 did not.


Stock Picks Recap for 5/3/12

With each stock's recap, we will include a (with market support) or (without market support) tag, designating whether the trade triggered with or without market directional support at the time. Anything in the first five minutes will be considered WITHOUT market support because market direction cannot be determined that early. ETF calls do not require market support, and are thus either winners or losers.
Huge day for our picks with everything working very cleanly since market direction pretty much stuck in one direction most of the session. Should have made a bundle.
From the report, CREE triggered long (with market support) and worked:

SQNM gapped over, no play.
BMRN triggered long (without market support) and worked:

RIMM triggered short (with market support) and worked:

DLLR triggered short (with market support) and worked:

CAVM triggered short (with market support) and worked:

SOHU triggered short (with market support) and worked:

In the Messenger, Rich's OIH triggered short (ETF, no market support needed) and worked:

His RIG triggered short (with market support) and worked great:

His COST triggered short (with market support) and worked:

SINA triggered short (with market support) and worked:

Rich's GOOG triggered long (with market support) and worked enough for a partial:

His GS triggered short (with market support) and worked great:

His PCLN triggered short (with market support) and didn't work:

In total, that's 12 trades triggering with market support, 11 of them worked, 1 did not.


Forex Calls Recap for 5/3/12

Here's an example of why you don't trade right at the moment of key interest rates announcements of the various banks. See EURUSD below.
New calls and Chat tonight, but tomorrow is NFP, so half size.
Here's the US Dollar Index intraday with market directional lines:

EURUSD:
Triggered short at A on a spike right on the ECB rate announcement and stopped. Triggered long at B and stopped: