Tradesight 2019 Forex Results
We post our daily results. You can access any of our systems through a 2-week free trial to make sure that we are honestly reporting the trades and what happened. Everything we do is archived for review and validation both publicly and privately.
Click here for the daily Forex daily recaps going back in time.
Click here for the monthly tallies of the net gains/losses and breakdown of winners and losers.
So this post is designed to easily summarize those results for 2019.
Total number of official Forex trade calls that triggered in 2019: 203 (down 50 from 2018)
Winners: 123 (down 10 from 2018 but with 50 less trades)
Losers: 80 (down 40 from 2018)
Winning percentage: 60.35%, which is right in our target range of 55-60%. We had 8 positive months and 4 negative months.
Net pip gains or losses for the year: +1095 pips (180 more than 2018)
This is a very interesting year that attests to the power of our system (not even including the Power Hour plays and the Value Area plays). The US Dollar was very contained for the year, in the narrowest overall range that I have ever seen. Because of it, we had less trades trigger and we were more cautious in our approach. Having said that, netting over 1000 pips is nothing to sneeze at in Forex once again. Our last four years now totals over 6300 pips, with all four years showing nice gains. This system just works, and it works consistently.
Tradesight December 2019 Stock Results
Tradesight has been providing stock calls daily since 2002. We post the results of our of our trades, winners and losers, in our reports and Market Blog every day. Some people might find it surprising to learn that while we track our Futures and Forex formal trade call results monthly, we don’t post anything beyond the trade reviews on our Stocks calls.
There is actually a very specific reason for this. I’ve never been a fan of trying to “hype” or “promote” something. Being profitable in trading is about learning what to do and getting yourself to make the right decisions. In Futures as well as in Forex, if we publish a call in advance, just about everyone should get the same fills and be able to get in and out at almost the same numbers. That isn’t always the case in stocks. It depends on how many shares you are trading and what the liquidity in the market for that stock is at the time. For that reason, I have already been hesitant to say “These are the exact results.” I would never want to try to suggest that someone would make a certain amount of dollars trading a certain number of shares or make a certain percentage. If I take a trade and sell it for a $0.30 gain, it makes a big statistical difference if someone else had to pay $0.05 more to get in and maybe got out for $0.02 less. That’s $0.23 instead of $0.30 even though the concept of the trade was fine.
However, after many requests, in October 2015, we started posting our results. You can see these monthly here.
In our system, you can basically break trades down into four categories: Big losers, small losers, small winners, and big winners.
In order to have any chance of succeeding in the markets, you have to have a system. There is no other way around it. I’ve been trading for 20 years now, and I’ve trained over 1000 people. You don’t make money if you don’t have a technically valid system for entry and exits.
Of the four categories of trades listed above, we simply don’t allow any of the first category, which is big losers. We always have a worst-case stop and we always stick to it. There should never be a scenario where you are still in a trade that is causing a significant loss if you follow our rules.
In terms of the other three categories, generally speaking, if you have about a third of your trades fall into each category, you should be making good money. In other words, if we have about 33% of our trades as small losers and 33% of trades as small winners, those basically would offset. That leaves the other 33% of so only as bigger winners, and that’s what we are here for. In our world, we count a loser as a trade that stops out (stops in our system are based on the price-level of the stock). We count a small winner as a trade that goes enough to make a partial and then either stops the second half of the trade under the entry or stops the second half of the trade slightly in the money, but no more than the partial was or so. Then the big winners are anything that keeps going beyond the partial.
So these were the results for November, which you can view here.
Tradesight Stock Results for November 2019
Number of trade calls that triggered with market support: 23
Number (and percent of total) of small losers: 6 (26.1%)
Number (and percent of total) of small winners: 6 (26.1%)
Number (and percent of total) of big winners: 11 (47.8%)
And for December?
Tradesight Stock Results for December 2019
Number of trade calls that triggered with market support: 20
Number (and percent of total) of small losers: 8 (40%)
Number (and percent of total) of small winners: 6 (30%)
Number (and percent of total) of big winners: 6 (30%)
You never expect much from the stock market in December because the last 1-2 weeks are a waste of time with the Holidays, and this was no exception. Twenty trades for the month is the least we've had trigger in a month ever.
Tradesight December 2019 Futures Results
Before we get to December's numbers, here is a short reminder of the results from November. The full report from November can be found here. You can also go back indefinitely by clicking here and scrolling down.
Tradesight Tick Results for November 2019
Number of trades: 47
Number of losers: 17
Winning percentage: 63.8%
Net ticks: +11 ticks
Reminder: Here are the rules.
1) Totals for the month are based on trades that occurred on trading days in the calendar month.
2) Trades are based on the calls in the Twitter feed exactly as we call them and manage them as well as the Opening Range plays under the basic strategy we teach for those in our course. We do not count everything you could have done from taking our courses and using our tools.
3) All trades are broken into two pieces, with the assumption that one half is sold at the first target and one half is sold at the final exit. These are then averaged. So if we made 6 ticks on one half and 12 on the second, that’s a 9-tick winner.
4) Pure losers (trades that just stop out) are considered 7 tick losers. We don’t risk more than that in the Twitter calls.
It is important to note that these results do not include the Tradesight Value Area or Institutional Range plays, all of which have been working quite well on their own.
You can go through the reports and compare the breakdown that I give as each trade is reviewed.
Tradesight Tick Results for December 2019
Number of trades: 42
Number of losers: 11
Winning percentage: 73.8%
Net ticks: +294.5 ticks
December is usually a great month for futures trading, and this one was certainly no exception. Despite the Holidays and 10 slow days (2 closed market days) to close out the year, we rocked it hard to end 2020. Big win ratio and massive tick gain. Solid.
Tradesight December 2019 Forex Results
Before we get to December's numbers, here is a short reminder of the results from November. The full report from November can be found here and you can get the last several months in a row vertically by clicking here and scrolling down.
Tradesight Pip Results for November 2019
Number of trades: 13
Number of losers: 4
Winning percentage: 69.2%
Worst losing streak: 3 in a row
Net pips: +80 pips
Reminder: Here are the rules.
1) Calls made in the calendar month count. In other words, a call made on August 31 that triggered the morning of September 1 is not part of September. Calls made on Thursday, September 30 that triggered between then and the morning of October 1 ARE part of September.
2) Trades that triggered before 8 pm EST / 5 pm PST (i.e. pre Asia) and NEVER gave you a chance to re-enter are NOT counted. Everything else is counted equally.
3) All trades are broken into two pieces, with the assumption that one half is sold at the first target and one half is sold at the final exit. These are then averaged. So if we made 40 pips on one half and 60 on the second, that’s a 50-pip winner. If we made 40 pips on one half, never adjusted our stop, and the second half stopped for the 25 pip loser, then that’s a 7 pip winner (15 divided by 2 is 7.5, and I rounded down).
4) Pure losers (trades that just stop out) are considered 25 pip losers. In some cases, this can be a few more or a few less, but it should average right in there, so instead of making it complicated, I count them as 25 pips.
5) Trade re-entries are valid if a trade stops except between 3 am EST and 9 am EST (when I’m sleeping). So in other words, even if you are awake in those hours and you could have re-entered, I’m only counting things that I would have done. This is important because otherwise the implication is that you need to be awake 24/6. Triggers that occur right on the Big Three news announcements each month don’t count as you shouldn’t have orders in that close at that time.
You can go through the reports and compare the breakdown that I give as each trade is reviewed.
Tradesight Pip Results for December 2019
Number of trades: 16
Number of losers: 4
Winning percentage: 75%
Worst losing streak: 1 in a row
Net pips: +230 pips
It was a strangely good month to end the year, even with the Holidays and several other days where nothing triggered. More trades triggered than November and we did pretty good! Great end to another great year.
Stock Picks Recap for 1/8/20
With each stock's recap, we will include a (with market support) or (without market support) tag, designating whether the trade triggered with or without market directional support at the time. Anything in the first five minutes will be considered WITHOUT market support because market direction cannot be determined that early. ETF calls do not require market support, and are thus either winners or losers.
From the report, no calls.
From the Messenger/Tradesight_st Twitter Feed, BIDU triggered long (with market support) and worked:
Rich's NVDA triggered long (with market support) and didn't work:
NUAN triggered long (with market support) and worked:
NFLX triggered long (with market support) and worked:
Rich's GOOGL triggered long (with market support) and didn't work:
GILD triggered long (with market support) and worked:
BKNG triggered long (with market support) and worked enough for a partial:
In total, that's 7 trades triggering with market support, 5 of them worked, 2 did not.
Futures Calls Recap for 1/8/20
The markets gapped up a little, pushed higher, came back, popped on Trump's announcement that we weren't going to escalate with Iran, went higher late, and sold off in the last minutes to close at 3255 on 2.4 billion NASDAQ shares.
Net ticks: +4 ticks.
As usual, let's start by taking a look at the ES and NQ with our market directional lines, VWAP, and Comber on the 5-minute chart from today's session:
ES and NQ Opening and Institutional Range Plays:
ES Opening Range Play triggered long at A and worked enough for a partial:
NQ Opening Range Play triggered long at A but too far out of range to take:
ES Tradesight Institutional Range Play:
NQ Tradesight Institutional Range Play:
ES:
Forex Calls Recap for 1/8/20
A loser for the session. See GBPUSD section below.
Here's a look at the US Dollar Index intraday with our market directional lines:
GBPUSD:
Triggered long at A and stopped:
Futures Calls Recap for 1/7/20
The markets gapped up, filled, and closed close to flat but red on 2.3 billion NASDAQ shares.
Net ticks: -5.5 ticks.
As usual, let's start by taking a look at the ES and NQ with our market directional lines, VWAP, and Comber on the 5-minute chart from today's session:
ES and NQ Opening and Institutional Range Plays:
ES Opening Range Play triggered long at A and stopped under the midpoint, triggered short at B and worked:
NQ Opening Range Play triggered long at A and stopped under the midpoint, triggered short at B and worked, both were too far out of range to take:
ES Tradesight Institutional Range Play:
NQ Tradesight Institutional Range Play:
ES:
Forex Calls Recap for 1/7/20
Closed a winner from the prior session, and then a loser and a new winner for the session. See GBPUSD section below.
Here's a look at the US Dollar Index intraday with our market directional lines:
GBPUSD:
Triggered long at A and stopped, triggered short at B, hit first target at C, stopped second half at D:
